I am sick to death of seeing essendon renter it forward 50 in a dumb, mick mcguanr cries out…..

It sounds like you’re frustrated with Essendon’s approach to entering the forward 50. If you feel their strategies are ineffective, you might be seeing repeated patterns of play that lack innovation or coherence.

Often, teams fall into predictable habits when entering the forward 50, relying heavily on certain tactics that the opposition can easily counter. If Essendon’s approach is repetitive and lacks variety, it can make their forward entries seem mechanical and easy to defend against.

In Australian rules football, a successful forward 50 entry typically involves a mix of precise passing, smart positioning, and quick decision-making. If Essendon’s methods seem dumb or uninspired, it could be a sign that they are missing these crucial elements. This could lead to a pattern where their forwards are consistently outnumbered or out-positioned, making it difficult to create scoring opportunities.

Additionally, if the criticism is aimed at a particular coaching style or tactical approach—such as Mick McGuane’s (if this is the reference you’re making)—it may be worth considering whether there are underlying issues with the team’s overall strategy. Coaching decisions, player execution, and team dynamics all play significant roles in how effectively a team can penetrate the forward 50 and capitalize on scoring chances.

Ultimately, a fresh perspective on tactics, better execution, and perhaps even a change in coaching philosophy might be necessary for Essendon to improve their forward 50 entries and make their play more dynamic and less predictable.